Happy Hari / Sutra / Asana, Dharana, Dhyana, Niyama

Happy Hari’s line has expanded from Meena Supreme and Gold Nag Champa to what is essentially two full new incense lines, both of which are replacements for previous lines that have been shifting around a bit. There are two series, one that features eight incenses all matching up with different types of yoga, and another that we’ll talk about later that is something of a “King of Incense” line, a line where some of our most recently reviewed incenses have ended up (with some name changes). So in many ways Happy Hari’s catalog changes kind of reflect the whole incense industry as a whole at this point, during a time where quality ingredients are becoming quite scarce and adjustments are being made – here you’re seeing slight changes to packaging and labelling.

However, it seems like I was sent almost two versions of the Sutra line, versions that were almost completely different. The first batch, which contained a few samples, was noticeably inferior to the second batch I received later. Assuming they were the same, I reviewed these four incenses from the samples only to find they were different in the next batch. For instance, the Yama Sutra incense was a charcoal in the first batch, but not in the second. But I’ve edited this so it now reflects what you should find in the packages you buy.

I would describe the Sutra line as something of a mix of styles, it would be very difficult to describe the range as a whole, as there are some very different incenses at work here. The line seems to be roughly split into one charcoal incenses, one masala hybrid and six champa and/or fluxo incenses. I thought about discussing the incenses in terms of how they match up with particular styles of yoga, as to be fair this seems to be the goal of the range, but in the end I can imagine few end users will be matching them up in such a way.

Asana Sutra is the charcoal incense. An early version of this incense seemed to be more of a charcoal hybrid similar to Madhavadas family incenses, but the actual released version seems to be a straight charcoal, although for the format it seems to be relatively clean. The first sample of this incense reminded me of some ayurvedic mixes and had enough benzoin in the mix to be classified as something of a loban. The released version is quite similar, especially in that it’s a mild aroma, but it seems to be much spicier and the loban similarities have mostly disappeared. The issue with such a mild charcoal incense is that it would probably take more samples than I have to describe it with any acuity, but for such a format this seems to reduce most of the issues (such as bitterness and smokiness) with charcoal.

Dharana Sutra has changed radically since my original review. This is the first incense in the line that makes me think Happy Hari went to some ends to really improve this group as Dharana is just as worthy of praise for different reasons. This isn’t a champa incense per se, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the base is a masala/charcoal hybrid of some sort, analagous to Madhavadas family incenses. But my what an aroma, it’s almost oud-like with its balance of quality wood oils and gentle florals. My guess is some age might take a bit of punch out of the stick since it’s so heavy in oils, but it should take a long time given the strength.

At first, I thought the original sample of the Dharana scent ended up as Dhyana, they’re both thick and sweet durbar incenses. The previous version of Dhyana Sutra looked to be something of a Honey Dust or Satya Natural type variant. The new and improved version is something of a musk champa, one that reminds me of Blue Pearl’s excellent version from a decade or two ago. This incense has quite a bit of similarity to Shroff’s Shanti incenses, although I think I like the sweeter and sugary direction here, it helps to balance out the heavy tanginess that Shanti exhibits. I do get a touch of citrus that the description gives, but fortunately it’s not overbearing. Overall, this is a truly excellent scent, the first in this group I’ll add to our Hall of Fame list.

Niyama Sutra has also become a much better incense than what was in the first batch, and if the Dhyana was the musk champa in this group, than surely the Niyama is the patchouli champa. The patchouli champa style was quite prevalent in the halmaddi days and was a unique combination that transmuted the qualities of patchouli into something with a pleasantly burnt type of aroma. On the other hand there was a generic patchouli champa that used to be part of a dipped range of champas that wasn’t quite as successful but had some interesting elements in that it had a bit of a crayon subaroma and a mellower patchouli vibe. The Niyama Sutra is more in the middle, it has the crayon subaroma as well as a slight touch of the old patchouli champa scent and comes off being fairly friendly overall. The description gives vanilla and rose, so it’s quite possibly my detection of patchouli is largely because this reminds me of patchouli champa, but I detect more of the former than latter. Still, very nice.

Coming up as soon as I can get them written up, the last four incenses in the Sutra range (Pranayama, Pratayahara, Samadhi, Yama), the “King of Incense” range, and four new scents from Dhuni. Thanks once again to Paul at Happy Hari for his generosity.

Song of India; Incense from India / India Temple; Damascus Cedar, Golden Sandalwood, Shimmer, Russian Rose

Incense from India may very well be the largest line of Indian incenses in the US market. Their website claims to have over 200 different fragrances. I first discovered this line of incenses in the mid 90s and while my tastes have changed quite a bit since then, many of my early favorites came from this line. To name a few that used to be at the top of my list but that I haven’t ordered since I started in on Japanese incense: Enchanted Garden (like Shrinivas Sugandhalaya’s Valley of Roses but much better), Golden Frankincense (resiny and peppery), Honey Dust (like Satya Natural) and Snow Apricot (a slightly fruity durbar). I’ve probably forgotten more scents from this line than I currently remember, but five came in as samplers a while back and I thought I’d log my impressions. But be assured that I don’t consider the incenses in question here among the line’s best by any means.

Incense from India, like just about all Indian incense, is very affordable and most if not all packages are well under $5, although the number of sticks per package may vary. One of the things I remember about the company is they sell bulk and it’s usually in that category where you can tell how deluxe a particular stick is, usually the durbars tend to be the high enders in this category (although, a charcoal dipped in white sandalwood oil, one of the few incenses that vein I’ve liked, was the highest at one point). The five incenses in question seem to all be masalas of a sort except for the first one, which is also a charcoal incense dipped in oil.

And as you can imagine, I don’t care too much for India Temple incense. It appears to be made by Song of India, and my sample came with the statement “Smells just like temples in India” which appears to fit the description. Well I’d like to hold out a bit better hope for how Indian temples smell. Like most charcoals, this is rather unpleasantly smoky, with an overwhelmingly spicy and floral oil that becomes cloying not soon after lighting. It’s difficult to tell what’s the oil and what’s the punk at times, all which mark a very low quality incense.

Damascus Cedar appears to be charcoal based on description, which would account for its off notes, but it appeared more like a masala to my eyes color wise. It struck a fairly decent balance between the superior Himalayan cedar trees and the ones that smell like pencil shavings. It’s fairly rich and dry, but like most charcoals and masalas the smoke makes it overwhelming at times, although at least in this case there’s no true bitter notes to exacerbate the aroma. From memory, I believe the line has better cedar incenses.

I do remember IfI’s Golden Sandalwood, after all it’s a slight variation on a classic masala blend (I seem to remember Blue Pearl having one similar, at least). While I tend to prefer oil heavy sandalwood durbars, it would be impossible to say Golden Sandalwood is unpleasant, rather it almost strikes me as the typical average Indian sandalwood, with many poorer and better on either side. Many of IfI’s incenses starting with Golden are often their best, but this wouldn’t be one of those. At least it has the buttery and spicy sandalwood smell, accentuated over the pure wood by other aromatics.

I don’t see Shimmer in the catalog anymore, maybe it was discontinued or perhaps it was pulled for its low quality. This is the sort of harsh and somewhat cheap or synthetic masala blend that while aiming for a sort of old school temple blend in style, ends up being something of a mess. I thought it was quite soapy and bitter overall, it’s hard to believe someone would burn this for pleasure.

Russian Rose is a masala and I have to come out in front saying I generally really dislike Indian rose masalas, in fact it wasn’t until I just tried Shoyeido/Royal/Rose that I actually found a rose I enjoyed, so I’m already fairly biased against this scent. Like most floral masalas the base tends to compromise the top notes and in this case that top note is a somewhat pungent rose oil that’s almost abrasive in its intensity. The overall aroma comes off like many commecial spray deoderizers, but at least it’s not as inferior as some I’ve tried.

Overall, the existence of this article is to note these in passing. While I’d love to enthuse over the better incenses in the Incense for India catalog, given that I’m finding most of my old Indian incenses sitting more in drawers than in holders, it’s hard to imagine when that would be. But I did want to make a point of this so that people aren’t necessarily turned off of the whole catalog by this unrepresentative handful.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 108 other followers