Himalayan Herbs Centre / Traditional Mandala, Nirvana A, Nirvana B, Nirvana C

Himalayan Herbs Centre incenses are quite wonderfully packaged. In essence you get two choices, you can buy the bamboo tube roll alone, which isn’t always ideal as the hole you make in an end isn’t easily closed without that something extra, or you can spend the extra money to get what are rather striking silk coverings, which do the job and look quite nice (not to mention looking reusable for refills or other similar bamboo tubes). Basically you get a red silk package for the Traditional Mandala and Nirvana A, a yellow for the Nirvana B and a blue for the Nirvana C.

Unfortunately, except for the Traditional Mandala which comes with inner packaging, the three Nirvanas are loose in the bamboo tubes which given the make of the incenses, leads to increased breakage across  the entire batch. In all three of the Nirvanas, over 50% to 75% of the sticks were fragmented. I take it that part of this was because of the lack of a bundle with inner packaging but it’s also clearly because these incenses are formulated differently than most Tibetan incenses, leaving the finished product brittle. On the other hand this same style leads to a fairly improved product for rolls under $10, and the HHCs are actually among the best incenses in the price range. And given how long Tibetan sticks generally are, it didn’t bother me terribly that the sticks were in fragments, but do be warned.

The Traditional Mandala Incense (second from bottom) could be the best of the four incenses. Despite its ingredient list showing nagi, jattamansi, kapur, cloves and red and white sandalwood, the dominant impression is of a very resinous, frankincense-heavy incense in a wood base.  Even though the base of red and white sandalwood (quite high quality I might add) is obvious and the clove spice fairly prevalent, the stick largely gives off a very orangey, resin-like aroma which reminds me a lot of some of the church resin-like blends except with the obvious woody base a stick brings with it. Overall it’s the least complex of the incenses in this grouping, but it’s extremely friendly and very pleasant and among my favorites in under $10 Tibetan incenses.

The Nirvana line is labelled A through C, but in all cases I would think it’s because of a difference in style rather than grading. As mentioned before, all three of these incenses are quite brittle and fragmentable, but this appears mostly to be due to an unusual base, one that weakens the binding across the incenses. Like the Traditional Mandala, the Nirvana A contains kapur, nagi and jattamansi, and I’d go as far to guess it probably shares the red and white sandalwood base as well. But overall it couldn’t really be more different, although it does share the woodiness and a bit of orange spice to it. The difference is the lack of a greater resin quantity in the A, leaving it spicy, pepper and largely woody. It’s actually quite strange that for such a woody stick that it has as much complexity, although I’ve been using this for about a year it still seems fairly mysterious at heart. It’s not terribly far from the original Red Crystal but doesn’t share that incense’s herbal and sage-like mix.

Nirvana B uses agur, chandan (sandalwood) and dukura, yet had I mixed up the ingredient lists with the names, I’d have guessed the B contains amber, both due to its pinkish color and obvious amberish tones. It’s this aroma that leaves this incense as the most accessible and friendliest of the trio, and is also one of the most high quality and aromatic incenses you can find at the $7.95 range. The mix of sandalwoods common to the previous two incenses is also prevalent here and let me mention again that it seems to be an uncommonly high quality mix for the range (although I suppose the chandan tag might have something to do with it being so noticeable in this one). Overall it’s light while still dense and aromatic, fairly complex and sweet with a bit of pepper for kick.

Nirvana C is the least accessible of the group and contains saffron, tsampaka, pangpay, sandalwood and amber/sal dhoop in its ingredients . I’ve mentioned incenses that resemble corn chips before, but this one is probably the most foodlike incense I’ve experience, like some new concoction from the Frito company. Very tangy with an almost mesquite-like quality in the mix, it’s a hard one to get used to, although I’ve found its complexity tends to help with the learning curve over time. Overall it’s one I’d probably leave until you’re sure you like the other three.

Anyway I’m quite fond of these incenses, not only do they look good in the silk coverings, but they are rather unusual mixes that don’t really resemble  most other incenses (although the Traditional Mandala does resemble the Natural Arogya-Karmayogi due to its high level of resin and typical binding style). You might want to take a pass on the Nirvanas if excessive fragmenting bothers you, but in doing so you’d be missing out on some of the better Tibetans in their price range.



  1. Noran said,

    August 26, 2010 at 10:57 am

    I have found that the list of ingredients on the packaging changes sometimes over the years. The Himalayan incense sticks changed ingredients and the Maha Mudra had a misprint for years (listed as the same as mind chakra). Brittle incense might mean old! I use http://www.hitherandyon.com , they vacuum seal all of their incense so its always fresh and never seems to be brittle. Does anyone know where I can get Zimpu ritual in bulk powder form?

  2. Mike said,

    April 17, 2009 at 9:00 am

    Hey Claire. I’m not totally sure, but I wouldn’t be surprised. For one thing there are two different companies, the Himalayan Herbal Centre and the Himalayan Herbs Centre. I know that I had two groups of incenses sorted out and one group had Lama Art House on the rolls, the other had Himalayan Herbs Centre and I thought I had gotten the right ones matched up, but I’ll have to double check on that. At the same time, the incenses by both “names” have similar bamboo tube packaging and similar fonts, but I do remember that the ones with silk coverings had a different name than the other two that didn’t have the,. It’s all quite confusing and it wouldn’t surprise me if a company might use two different names.

    It’s funny, though, in your review you say your incense was all intact and not brittle when my experience was the opposite. But your experience of the scent was definitely close enough to mine.

    • Mike said,

      April 20, 2009 at 11:24 am

      Claire, I checked the rolls and realize I had these mixed up, so I’ve edited the review to the correct company name etc. Thanks for spotting that. 🙂 The Lama Art House incenses will be forthcoming. Himalayan Herbs Centre appears to be a bigger outfit than I had thought, they’re also responsible for a few incenses I reviewed a while back that aren’t nearly this good. I think Beth at Essence also has a new gift box on her front page right now with powders, a roll and a burner.

      • Claire said,

        April 20, 2009 at 3:33 pm

        I’d better double check the label on my own bamboo tube as I thought it was by Himalayan Herbal (not Herbs) Centre. Darn them having two companies with such similar names, it’s hard enough as it is with different companies using the same names for different blends. I’ll get back to you…

  3. Claire said,

    April 17, 2009 at 3:02 am

    Is Lama Art House the same company as Himalayan Herbal Centre? The names and packages sound the same. My review for Nirvana B can be found in the comments here:


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: